By Martin Morrison
Do you know that there is one page in the Bible that is not inspired by God? Trust me, it’s in every Bible I have ever opened. In my ESV Bible it is an empty page between the end of Malachi and the beginning of Matthew. It is empty but for three words, “The New Testament”. In older printings, there is a fuller statement, “The New Testament of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ”. Those words werewas never inspired by God. The publishers of Bibles have included the pageit from time immemorial. And no-one seems to protest!
Now here is a childish game invented by Alec Motyer, but it’s actually very serious. You won’t actually want to do it, so just try it in your mind. The game is this:; suppose you tore that page out, where would you put it back? Well, for a start, not between Malachi and Matthew! Just think: Malachi foretells the coming of a forerunner (Malachi 3:1; 4:5). Matthew then announces that the forerunner has arrived (Matthew 3:1). Plainly, it is mistaken to insert a page holding these two books apart! In fact, there’s nowhere suitable to put it. This dividing page is a waste of paper and ink! It is separating the inseparable, dividing the indivisible. The Bible is one book.
Many years ago, Alec Motyer a British Old Testament scholar was speaking at a conference hosted by R C Sproul. At the end of a session, Motyer was asked about the relationship between Old Testament Israel and the church. After saying something about the discontinuities, he insisted that we are all one people of God. Then he asked his audience to imagine how an Israelite under Moses would give their “testimony”. Motyer respondedcontinued, and said that they would have probably have said something like this:
“We were in a foreign land, in bondage, under the sentence of death. But our mediator, the one who stands between us and God, came to us with the promise of deliverance. We trusted in the promises of God, took shelter under the blood of the lamb, and he led us out. Now we are on our way to the Promised Land. We are not there yet, of course, but we have the law to guide us, and through blood sacrifice we also have his presence in our midst. So he will stay with us until we get to our true country, our everlasting home”.
Then Dr Motyer concluded, “Now think about it. A Christian today could say the same thing, almost word for word”.
Perhaps that last paragraph will revolutionize your thinking about the Old Testament. Most people think that in the Old Testament, people were saved through obeying a host of detailed laws, but that today we are saved by grace through faith. But not so at all. In both the Old and New Testament, we are saved through the substitutionary blood sacrifice of a third party. In both Testaments, atonement is by grace, through faith. As early as Genesis, we find our father and patriarch Abram saved by faith, not works!! (Genesis 15:6; Romans 4:1 – 3). In addition, in both Testaments we respond in a pursuit of holiness and obedience.
So then, how do we understand the difference between the Old and New Testament? How do we understand Hebrews 1:1 – 4 that tells us that there are two stages of divine revelation?. And it’s obvious that these two stages correspond to the Old and New Testament. Well, the answer is that divine revelation is to be seen asto be progressive. But it is not the progression from the less true to the more true, from the less worthy to the more worthy, or from the less mature to the more mature. How can that be, if the author is the one and same God!
No, the progression is from promise to fulfilment. The promises in the first Testament are fulfilled in the coming of the long expected Old Testament Messiah, the Christ. So Jesus the risen Christ, spoke to the two despondent disciples on the road to Emmaus, “And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he interpreted to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself” (Luke 24:27). So Jesus walked them through the Old Testament and showed them how the Old Testament was pointing to him!! Jesus explained to them how he himself fulfilled the promises of the Old Testament. Which is precisely why, we always need to look for Jesus when reading the Old Testament.
The other day, I married a couple in my office. When it came to the rings, the bride, as is customaryper normal, already had a beautiful engagement ring on her ring finger. To that ring the groom added a wedding ring. We didn’t remove the engagement ring. No, the engagement ring signified a promise, made by the groom sometime back to marry his bride. Now on their wedding day, he added a wedding ring, which was the fulfilment of that promise. It is not that the engagement ring is less worthy or less important than the wedding ring. Not at all. The engagement ring is the promise, and the wedding ring is the fulfilment of that promise. Both are important.
In the same way, the Old Testament is the promise. The New Testament is the fulfilment of that promise. Both are important. In fact I’ll let you in on a secret. I, it is very difficult to understand the New Testament without understanding the Old. And vice versa. You see, the Bible is one book.
For further reading:
Alec Motyer, Loving the Old Testament; One Book; One God; One Story.
Graeme Goldsworthy, The Goldsworthy Trilogy – Gospel and Kingdom; Gospel and Wisdom; Gospel and Revelation.
Both at Amazon Kindle.